The Run Sheet

✅ How it went — Thursday October 29

No run sheet this week — the teams were made on the night. So there are no planned splits on this page, because there were none. What there is: the real rosters from the match record, each priced with the model exactly as it stood before the night, and graded honestly against what happened. Every game ran with bots filling both sides to 6v6, as always. 9 customs, 6 names, nobody sat.

Winner in gold. The pre-night favourite went 7–2, and side A won 3 against 4.1 expected. Crowns: 🎯 kills Ice 380 · 💚 healing Zach 94k · 🧱 damage soaked Ice 162k. Kill leaders: Ice 380/80 · Tomas 335/111 · Michael 326/73 · Jonathan 291/67 · Zach 283/89 · Jared 153/100.

The repetition receipt: Jonathan+Tomas rode together 9 of 9 shared games against the 3.6 a random split deals, and the night's mean pair excess was 2.72, against an average of 1.62 across the 4 sheet-built nights on record.

Did the prices hold? Yes — the favourite won 7 of 9, and nobody's run of games landed outside what the prices allowed. Across all 6 players, the correlation between what the model rated a player and how their night went was +0.50 — the ratings and the night pointed the same way.

⚖ What still applies

• Everybody plays. The prime decree, permanent. Bots fill every empty seat to 6v6 — it is always 6v6, whatever the human count, and nobody ever sits.
• The grade doesn't need a sheet. Teams come from the match record, prices come from the model as it stood beforehand. No sheet means no plan to grade, not no grading.
• Nobody is judged on night one. Or night four. Ratings move with games, not arguments.

📜 Last time out (10/22), for the record

9 customs, no site-built sheet, 8 names. The favourite went 2–7 and side A won 3 against 4.6 expected. Kill leaders: Kyle 377/53 · Tomas 298/77 · Don 270/63 · Michael 254/63.

Repetition that night: Jonathan+Kyle together 6 of 6, mean pair excess 1.631. Full grade in the data.